Guide · June 2026

RitmoSync vs. MyWhoosh — honest comparison

What MyWhoosh does well

If you want a Zwift-like experience without paying ~$20/month, MyWhoosh is a strong pick. You still create a cloud account and install an app, but the core riding experience is free.

What RitmoSync does well

When you want zones, export, and low overhead without another platform account, gamification, or a heavy native client — RitmoSync is built for that.

CSV and FIT: where the data differs

MyWhoosh stores rides in your cloud account. You can download a standard FIT file or sync to Strava and similar tools — session summaries, power curves, and platform analytics from there.

RitmoSync Pro keeps files on your device and offers both FIT and unusually deep CSV:

If you only upload FIT to Strava, either app can work. If you want raw data and pre-built windowed aggregates in spreadsheets without parsing FIT yourself, RitmoSync’s CSV layer is the differentiator — a power-user export, not something every rider needs.

Side by side

Feature comparison: RitmoSync and MyWhoosh
Feature RitmoSync MyWhoosh
Monthly subscriptionNo — free tier + optional one-time ProNo for core features
Virtual worlds / racingNoYes
Live FTP zonesYesYes (in workouts)
Custom interval programsYes (Pro)Yes (workout builder; some slot limits)
Auto resistance (ERG)No (manual today)Yes
Runs in browserYes (Chrome/Edge)No — native app required
Account requiredNo (free tier)Yes
Data storageLocal on deviceCloud account
ANT+ supportNo (Bluetooth FTMS only)Yes (via native app)
FIT exportYes (Pro) — export from the app on your deviceYes — download .FIT from your profile, or auto-sync via connected platforms (e.g. Strava)
CSV export (raw + windowed stats)Yes (Pro) — 1s, 30s, and zone CSV with quartiles and Ritmo PowerFIT-focused; no equivalent multi-layer CSV from the app
Device load / batteryLight — no 3D world; browser or slim Mac appHeavier — full simulation client (3D, physics, social layer)
Ongoing upgrade pressureOne-time Pro optional; no subscriptionFree core, but frequent app updates; optional credits, cosmetics, coach plans
In-app purchasesPro license onlyOptional (cosmetics, slot credits, coach plans)

MyWhoosh pricing and slot-credit details can change — check their site for current terms. Core riding remains free; some premium workouts and coach plans may use credits or separate purchases.

Common questions

Why not just use MyWhoosh? It’s free.
MyWhoosh is an excellent free alternative to Zwift if you want worlds, racing, ERG, and FIT export through your account. RitmoSync is for riders who want a simple power display, local-only data, browser access, and no platform account — plus a one-time Pro fee for on-device history and FIT files.
Can I use both?
Yes — many riders do. Use MyWhoosh for social rides and simulation; use RitmoSync for quick zone checks, custom intervals, or FIT export without opening a full virtual world. Only one app can hold the Bluetooth connection at a time, so quit MyWhoosh before pairing in RitmoSync.
Which has better trainer support?
MyWhoosh’s native apps support FTMS and ANT+, so more setups work out of the box. RitmoSync is narrower — standard Bluetooth FTMS in Chrome/Edge or the Mac app. If your trainer only works over ANT+ or a proprietary bridge, MyWhoosh may connect where RitmoSync won’t. Test your bike in RitmoSync free to confirm.
Which exports more training metrics?
For platform upload, both offer FIT. RitmoSync Pro adds CSV with a raw 1-second stream and pre-built 30-second and zone tables — median, quartiles, Ritmo Power, and more per row. That is aimed at spreadsheet or script workflows; MyWhoosh riders typically rely on FIT plus Strava or TrainingPeaks charts. RitmoSync CSV column guide.
Which is lighter on laptop battery?
RitmoSync — no virtual world to render. MyWhoosh runs a full 3D simulation with avatars, courses, and physics, which uses more CPU and GPU. For long sweet-spot sessions on a laptop unplugged, a minimal power UI often runs cooler and longer.
Does RitmoSync avoid constant upgrades and subscriptions?
RitmoSync has a free tier and optional one-time Pro ($39.90). No monthly platform fee. MyWhoosh’s core riding stays free, but expect regular app updates, account features, and optional purchases (credits, cosmetics, coach content). RitmoSync is intentionally narrow — fewer moving parts, no subscription treadmill.
Which is better for FIT export to Strava?
Both support it. MyWhoosh stores rides in your cloud account — you can download .FIT files from your profile or link Strava through Connections for automatic upload. RitmoSync keeps history on your device and exports FIT locally with Pro ($39.90 once) — no platform account, and you choose when to upload. Pick MyWhoosh if you already ride there and want built-in sync; pick RitmoSync if you want export without a cloud-first workflow.
Which is better for structured training?
Both offer structured workouts. MyWhoosh bundles them inside a full simulation with ERG and route visuals. RitmoSync strips that down to zone targets and timers — you adjust resistance manually. Pick MyWhoosh if ERG and immersion matter; pick RitmoSync if you want the simplest path to watts, zones, and local FIT export.

Who RitmoSync is for (vs MyWhoosh)

Choose MyWhoosh if you want a free, full-featured virtual cycling platform with ERG and community. Choose RitmoSync if you want focused power training with minimal overhead. See also: RitmoSync vs. Zwift.

Try RitmoSync free in Chrome — no account, no download.

Open web app Get Pro — $39.90